Volatile organic compounds for diagnosis of early hepatocellular carcinoma in at-risk patients.

BACKGROUND: Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) have been shown as promising biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnosis. We aimed to investigate the performance of VOCs for diagnosing early-stage HCC in patients at-risk for HCC. METHODS: VOCs were identified in exhaled breath samples collected from 87 early-stage HCC patients, 90 cirrhotic patients, and 72 HBV-infected patients using thermal desorption-gas chromatography/field-asymmetric ion mobility spectrometry. The VOC levels were compared between the three groups. An association between VOCs and HCC was determined using logistic regression analysis. Diagnostic performance of VOCs was estimated using the AUROC and compared to serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP). RESULTS: The levels of acetone monomer, dimethyl sulfide, 1,4-pentadiene, isopropyl alcohol, and acetone dimer were significantly different between the three groups. After adjusting for liver function test and AFP, acetone dimer was significantly associated with HCC. Acetone dimer significantly outperformed AFP with 86.2 % vs. 61.2 % sensitivity, 87.6 % vs. 66.2 % specificity, 86.9 % vs. 63.5 % for accuracy, and AUROC of 0.908 vs. 0.665, p = 0.007, <0.001, <0.001, and 0.001, respectively, for differentiating between HCC and cirrhosis. CONCLUSION: Acetone showed a better performance than AFP for diagnosing early HCC in at-risk patients. Further studies to validate the utility of VOCs as an HCC surveillance tool are needed.

Modified albumin-bilirubin predicted survival of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Modified albumin-bilirubin (mALBI) grade has been established as a survival determinant in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who receive locoregional and targeted therapies. AIM: To investigate whether mALBI could predict survival in unresectable HCC (uHCC) patients who were treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (AB). METHODS: A single-center, retrospective cohort study enrolled uHCC patients who received AB treatment between September 2020 and April 2023 and were followed up until June 2023. An association between mALBI and patient survival was determined using Cox proportional hazards analysis. RESULTS: Of the 83 patients, 67 patients (80.7%) were male with the mean age of 60.6 years. Among them, 22 patients (26.5%) were classified as Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer B, and 61 patients (73.5%) were classified as Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer C. Cirrhosis was present in 76 patients (91.6%), with 58 patients classified as Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) A and 18 as CTP B. The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival were 13.0 mo [95% confidence interval (CI): 5.2-20.8] and 9.0 mo (95%CI: 5.0-13.0), respectively. The patients were divided into two groups based on mALBI grades: 42 patients (50.6%) in the mALBI 1 + 2a group; and 41 patients (49.4%) in the mALBI 2b + 3 group. During the median follow-up period of 7.0 mo, the mALBI 1 + 2a group exhibited significantly better survival compared to the mALBI 2b + 3 group, with a median OS that was not reached vs 3.0 mo (95%CI: 0.1-6.0, P < 0.001). In a subgroup of patients with CTP A, the mALBI 1 + 2a group also showed significantly longer survival compared to the mALBI 2b + 3 group, with a median OS that was not reached vs 6.0 mo (95%CI: 3.4-8.6, P < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, both CTP class and mALBI grade were independently associated with survival, with adjusted hazard ratios (95%CI) of 2.63 (1.19-5.78, P = 0.020) and 3.90 (1.71-8.90, P = 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: mALBI grades can determine survival of uHCC patients receiving AB treatment, particularly those who have mildly impaired liver function. This highlights the importance of assessing mALBI before initiating AB treatment to optimize therapeutic efficacy in clinical practice.

Circulating tumor cells as a prognostic biomarker in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have been shown as a surrogate for cancer progression and prognostication. We aimed to determine an association between CTCs and survival of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. Peripheral blood was obtained from 73 HCC patients to enumerate for epithelial CTCs/8 mL blood. CTCs were detected by immunoaffinity-based method using epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) and mucin1 (MUC1). The CTCs detection rates of BCLC stages A, B, and C patients were 65.4% (17/26), 77.3% (17/22), and 96% (24/25), respectively, p = 0.018. Patients with CTCs < 5 cells/8 mL had significantly longer survival than those with CTCs ≥ 5 cells/8 mL (>36 vs. 4.6 months, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, CTP B, BCLC B, BCLC C, AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL, and CTC ≥ 5 cells/8 mL were independently associated with survival, with adjusted HRs (95%CI) of 4.1 (2.0-8.4), 3.5 (1.1-11.4), 4.7 (1.4-15.4), 2.4 (1.1-5.0), and 2.6 (1.2-8.4); p < 0.001, 0.036, 0.011, 0.025 and 0.012, respectively. The combination of CTCs ≥ 5 cells/8 mL and AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL provided additively increased HR to 5.3 (2.5-11.1), compared to HRs of 4.0 (2.0-8.0) and 3.5 (1.8-6.7) for CTCs ≥ 5 cells/8 mL and AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL, p < 0.001, respectively. The larger number of peripheral CTCs is correlated with higher tumor aggressive features and poorer survival of HCC patients. CTCs can potentially become novel prognostic biomarker in HCC.

Physician- and patient-reported barriers to hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance: A nationwide survey.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance rates are suboptimal. We aimed to identify HCC surveillance barriers from both physician's and patient's perspectives and assess the effectiveness of physician education using social networks. A nationwide survey with 513 physicians and another single-center survey with 315 HCC-risk patients were conducted. Barriers to suboptimal surveillance were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. We educated 143 physicians by sending brief notes on HCC surveillance guidelines via social networks and re-evaluated their knowledge after 60 days using t test. Surveys showed 458 (86.3%), 254 (47.8%), and 225 (42.4%) physicians recommended surveillance in patients with cirrhosis, at-risk hepatitis B virus, and hepatitis C virus infection, respectively. Only 228 (42.9%) and 241 (38.0%) respondents adhered to recommended surveillance tools and interval, respectively. The main surveillance barriers among physicians were the lack of knowledge and resource limitations. The lack of a doctor's prescription was identified as a major barrier by patient' perspectives (odds ratio 1.4, 95% CI: 1.1-1.8, P = .024). Education via social networks enhanced physicians' knowledge, with pre- and post-education scores for guideline awareness of 63.0% versus 84.3% (P < .001) and for surveillance indication and tools of 40.0% versus 63.0% (P = .001), and 42.0% versus 59.3% (P = .015), respectively. Physicians' knowledge gap is a primary barrier for adherence to HCC surveillance protocols. Brief education via social networks shows effectiveness at increasing physicians' knowledge of HCC surveillance.

Outcome and validation of a new clinically based staging system for predicting survival of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Currently available staging systems for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) are not applicable to patients with unresectable stage. A new clinical staging system for perihilar CCA (pCCA) subtype has been recently developed in a US cohort, with a good performance in predicting survival of all pCCA patients. We aimed to determine outcomes of pCCA patients and evaluate predictive performance of this staging system in an Asian population. METHODS: All 141 patients diagnosed with pCCA between 2003 and 2012 were identified. Clinical information was retrospectively abstracted. Patients were classified into four stages based on the new staging system. Survival predictors were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazard analysis. RESULTS: Of the 141 pCCA patients, 38 (27%), 101 (72%), and 2 (1%) received resection, palliative biliary drainage ± chemotherapy, and best supportive care, respectively. Survival predictors included resectable disease, tumor size, distant metastasis, and cancer antigen 19-9 ≥ 1000 U/mL. When classified by clinical stages, 13, 4, 99, and 25 patients were in stages I, II, III, and IV, with median survivals of 18.4, 7.3, 6.3, and 2.6 months; and hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) of 1.0 (reference), 1.7 (0.5-5.5), 3.2 (1.5-6.7), and 10.8 (4.6-25.0), respectively. CONCLUSION: The clinical staging system has a limited performance in differentiating stage II pCCA patients from stage III patients in the Thai cohort. This can be due to differences in patient characteristics and treatment modalities between the Asian and White pCCA populations. However, the median survivals of patients with other stages are significantly different.